Johnston v. Russell et al
JUDGMENT adopting 47 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge denying granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants, dismissing Plaintiff's claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies without prejudice, but with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis. It Is Further Ordered that 17 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Plaintiff is denied. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 7/19/2021. (crt,Crawford, A)
Case 3:20-cv-00740-TAD-KDM Document 48 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 307
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
JERRY D. JOHNSTON
CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0740
JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY
SHERIFF JAY RUSSELL, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no
objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record
in this matter,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 23], is GRANTED and that Plaintiff Jerry D. Johnston’s claims
are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies but
WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 17], is DENIED.
MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 19th day of July 2021.
TERRY A. DOUGHTY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?