Landry-Bell v. Various Inc et al

Filing 14

NOTICE of Deficiency to David A Szwak on behalf of Shelly Landry-Bell re: Motion for Enlargement of time to Effect Service of Summons upon Defendant submitted on 12/02/05. Reason: Needs statement of consent. (crt,Brown, A)

Download PDF
Landry-Bell v. Various Inc et al Doc. 14 Case 5:05-cv-01526-TS-MLH Document 14 Filed 12/02/2005 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA S H R E VE P O RT DIVISION SHE LLY LANDRY-BELL VERSUS VA RIOU S INC, ET AL NOTICE OF DEFICIENT DOCUMENT N O T I C E TO FILER: T h e Motion For Enlargement of time to Effect Service Upon Defendant Zach Wilhelm filed on D e c e m b e r 2, 2005 by Shelly Landry-Bell was DEFICIENT for the following reason(s): C I V IL ACTION NO. 5:05CV1526 J U D G E STAGG M A G . JUDGE HORNSBY T Y o u do not indicate whether opposing counsel consent to the granting of this ex parte m o t i o n. Please refer to LR7.4.1W, 7.6W, or 7.9W for specific instructions regarding statem ents of consent. The motion cannot be referred to chambers until this deficiency is corrected. Please return this notice and only the necessary corrected papers to the undersigned docket c l e r k at the address given below within 10 days from the date of this notice or the document ma y be stricken by the court. PLEASE ENTITLE THE SUBMISSION, "CORRECTIVE D O C U M E N T . " Please note that all filing deadlines previously set remain in effect. Issuance of t h i s deficiency does not amount to an extension of any deadline. F o r questions regarding this document or transmission, please call our CM/ECF help desk at 18 6 6 - 3 2 3 -1 1 0 1 . P l e a se return your "corrective document" to: Clerk, U. S. District Court, ATTN: Amanda B r o w n , 300 Fannin St., Ste. 1167, Shreveport, LA 71101 Shre vep ort, Louisiana, December 2, 2005. ROBERT H. SHEM WE LL C L E R K OF COURT Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?