Landry-Bell v. Various Inc et al

Filing 51

NOTICE of Motion Setting without oral argument regarding 50 MOTION to Compel, MOTION for Sanctions. Motion day set for 9/4/2007 before Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Smith, C)

Download PDF
Landry-Bell v. Various Inc et al Doc. 51 Case 5:05-cv-01526-TS-MLH Document 51 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA S H R E VE P O RT DIVISION S H E L L Y LANDRY-BELL VERSUS V A R I O U S INC, ET AL C I V I L ACTION NO. 5:05CV1526 J U D G E STAGG M A G I S T R A T E JUDGE HORNSBY N O T I C E OF MOTION(S) T h e Motion to Compel, Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 50) filed by Shelly Landry-Bell on J u l y 31, 2007 will be submitted to the Honorable Mark L. Hornsby on the September 4, 2007, M o t i o n Day at Shreveport, Louisiana. A written ruling or recommendation will be issued in due course. Deadlines A n y party who opposes the motion may file a memorandum in opposition within 15 c a le n d a r days from the date of this notice. The movant may file a reply memorandum, without l e av e of court, within 7 business days after the memorandum in opposition is filed. LR 7.8W g o v e r n s the length of the memoranda. C o u r t e s y Copies Required A paper courtesy copy of the motion, opposition, and reply brief must be delivered to c h a m b e r s promptly after filing. The mailing address is 300 Fannin St., Suite 4300, Shreveport, L A 71101. N o Oral Argument I t is the policy of the Court to decide motions on the basis of the record without oral a r g u m e n t . Briefs should fully address all pertinent issues. All parties will be notified if the Court find s oral argument is necessary. D a t e of Notice: August 7, 2007. RO BER T H. SHEM WE LL C L E R K OF COURT C O P Y SENT DAT E: August 7, 2007 BY: cas TO: MLH Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?