Landry-Bell v. Various Inc et al

Filing 8

NOTICE of Motion Setting without oral argument regarding 4 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). Motion day set for 11/7/2005 before Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Brown, A)

Download PDF
Landry-Bell v. Various Inc et al Doc. 8 Case 5:05-cv-01526-TS-MLH Document 8 Filed 10/03/2005 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA S H R E VE P O RT DIVISION SHE LLY LANDRY-BELL VERSUS V A R IO U S INC., ET AL N O T I C E OF MOTION(S) SETTING(S) T h e motion to dismiss (Document No. 4) filed by Various Inc. on September 28, 2005 w i l l be submitted to the Honorable Mark L. Hornsby on the November 7, 2005, Motion Day at S h r e v e p o r t , Louisiana. A written ruling will be issued in due course. A n y party who opposes the motion may file a memorandum in opposition within 15 c a l e n d a r days from the date of this notice. The movant may file a reply memorandum, without leave of court, within seven (7) business days after the memorandum in opposition is filed. LR 7 . 8 W governs the length of the memoranda. A COURTESY COPY OF ALL MEMORANDA MUST BE DELIVERED TO C H A M B E R S PROM P T L Y AFTER FILING. The mailing address is 300 Fannin St., Suite 4300, S h r e v ep o r t, LA 71101. I t is the policy of the Court to decide motions on the basis of the record without oral a r gu m e n t . Accordingly, responses and briefs should fully address all pertinent issues. Should the C o u r t feel oral argument is necessary, all parties will be notified. I f the parties resolve any matters raised in this motion, the moving party should i m m e d ia t el y notify Magistrate Judge Hornsby at 318/676-3265. C I V IL ACTION NO. 5:05CV1526 J U D G E STAGG M A G . JUDGE HORNSBY T H U S DONE October 3, 2005. RO BER T H. SHEM WE LL C L E R K OF COURT C O P Y SENT DAT E: October 3, 2005 BY: kf TO: MLH Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?