Jackson v. Prator et al
Filing
28
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 27 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Plaintiff's civil rights claims. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 05/30/2013. (crt,McDonnell, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SHREVEPORT DIVISION
ROBERT JACKSON, III
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-0909-P
VERSUS
JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.
STEVE PRATOR, ET AL.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY
JUDGMENT
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack
of written objections filed by Plaintiff and determining that the findings are correct under the
applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s civil rights claims against Steve Prator, Robert
Wyche, Dr. Florinoid, Manager Boone, Patsy Lewis, Patsy Williams, Caddo Parish
Commission, Madison Parish Sheriff’s Office, Warden of Madison Parish Jail, Major John
Doe, Warden of River Correctional Center, Major John Doe 2, Collinston Correctional
Center, Warden of Collinston Correctional Center, Louisiana Department of Public Safety
and Corrections, Jason Waltman, Warden Goodwin, Jamie Fussel, and the Louisiana
Department of Public Safety and Corrections be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS
FRIVOLOUS under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) .
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s civil rights claims seeking monetary
compensation from Coriletha Stewart for her allegedly unconstitutional prosecution and
from Susan Owens, Kenya Ellis, Geya Prudhomme, Brian Barner, Warren Glen Mangham,
and Charles Scott for his allegedly unconstitutional conviction and sentence be
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) until such
time as the Heck conditions are met.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s civil rights claims against the State of
Louisiana be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 30th day
of May, 2013.
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?