Hill v. Phan et al

Filing 165

ORDER denying 114 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 116 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 135 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 136 Motion to Dismiss; granting 143 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 161 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 05/05/2016. (crt,McDonnell, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION DAVID LEE HILL CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-0583 VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. HAI PHAN, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY ORDER For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, no written objections having been filed, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions for Summary Judgment (Record Documents 114 and 116) be and are hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment by Hai Phan (“Phan”) (Record Document 135) be and is hereby GRANTED by dismissing the claim against Phan for excessive force and dismissing with prejudice all other claims against Phan to being asserted again until Plaintiff satisfies the Heck conditions. See Johnson v. McElveen, 101 F.3d 423, 424 (5th Cir. 1996). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss by Willie Shaw (“Shaw”) (Record Document 136) be and is hereby GRANTED and all claims against Shaw are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment by Steve Prator (“Sheriff Prator”) (Record Document 143) be and is hereby GRANTED and all claims against Sheriff Prator are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against “Unknown SPD Officer,” now known to be Corporal Scebern Willis, be and are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this the 5th day of May, 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?