Lester v. Wells Fargo Bank N A et al

Filing 115

JUDGMENT adopting 102 Report and Recommendations; denying 87 Motion to Compel because the information sought by Plaintiff in RFP 6 is irrelevant. It is further ordered that Plaintiffs request to void the summary judgment due to fraud is denied because no fraud was committed and, alternatively, the request for relief under Rule 60(b) is untimely. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 3/22/2021. (crt,Bunting, M)

Case 5:15-cv-02439-SMH-MLH Document 115 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2539

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SHREVEPORT DIVISION
JOANNA PRUITT LESTER

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-2439

VERSUS

CHIEF JUDGE HICKS

WELLS FARGO BANK NA, ET AL

MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY
ORDER

For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, including the
written objections filed, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under
the applicable law;
It is ordered that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 87) is denied
because the information sought by Plaintiff in RFP 6 is irrelevant. It is further ordered that
Plaintiff’s request to void the summary judgment due to fraud is denied because no fraud
was committed and, alternatively, the request for relief under Rule 60(b) is untimely.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this the 22nd day of March,
2021.