Williams v. Jones et al
Filing
11
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Patrick Joseph Williams. IT IS ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus, to the extent that it may be construed as a second and successive petit ion, be DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this pleading, to the extent that it may be construed as a Motion for New Trial pursuant to FRCP Rule 59, be DENIED as untimely and without merit; and, that to the extent that it may be construed as a Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(b) be DENIED for the reason that it is manifestly without merit. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 6/22/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SHREVEPORT DIVISION
PATRICK JOSEPH WILLIAMS
LA. DOC #283412
vs.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-2519
SECTIONP
JUDGE ELIZABETH E. FOOTE
WARDEN VICTOR JONES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES
JUDGMENT
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the
findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and
Recommendation in the record;
IT IS ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus, to the extent that it may be
construed as a second and successive petition, be DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this pleading, to the extent that it may be construed
as a Motion for New Trial pursuant to FRCP Rule 59, be DENIED as untimely and without
merit; and, that to the extent that it may be construed as a Motion for Relief from Judgment
pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(b) be DENIED for the reason that it is manifestly without merit~
J
(J, ~S DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on thi,.,) ..L;{..y
ofii{;,~o'J6.
~
ELIZABE~
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?