Williams v. Jones et al

Filing 11

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Patrick Joseph Williams. IT IS ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus, to the extent that it may be construed as a second and successive petit ion, be DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this pleading, to the extent that it may be construed as a Motion for New Trial pursuant to FRCP Rule 59, be DENIED as untimely and without merit; and, that to the extent that it may be construed as a Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(b) be DENIED for the reason that it is manifestly without merit. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 6/22/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION PATRICK JOSEPH WILLIAMS LA. DOC #283412 vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-cv-2519 SECTIONP JUDGE ELIZABETH E. FOOTE WARDEN VICTOR JONES MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record; IT IS ORDERED that this petition for habeas corpus, to the extent that it may be construed as a second and successive petition, be DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this pleading, to the extent that it may be construed as a Motion for New Trial pursuant to FRCP Rule 59, be DENIED as untimely and without merit; and, that to the extent that it may be construed as a Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(b) be DENIED for the reason that it is manifestly without merit~ J (J, ~S DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on thi,.,) ..L;{..y ofii{;,~o'J6. ~ ELIZABE~

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?