Brock v. Cain et al
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 13 Motion for Disclosure. The undersigned has recently issued a Report and Recommendation that explained that the claims asserted in the petition are barred from habeas review under the doctrine of Stone v. Powell, 96 S.Ct. 3037 (1976). Accordingly, the Motion for Disclosure is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 3/21/2018. (crt,Keller, J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SHREVEPORT DIVISION
DAMIONE BROCK
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-cv-2586
VERSUS
CHIEF JUDGE HICKS
N. BURL CAIN, ET AL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus that attacked his state court
convictions on the grounds that the state courts improperly denied his motion to suppress
based on Fourth Amendment arguments. Petitioner argues that the State knowingly used
altered surveillance video evidence at the suppression hearing. He has filed a Motion for
Disclosure (Doc. 13) that asks the court to order the district attorney to provide the court
with the surveillance video evidence for consideration at a hearing. The undersigned has
recently issued a Report and Recommendation that explained that the claims asserted in
the petition are barred from habeas review under the doctrine of Stone v. Powell, 96 S.Ct.
3037 (1976). Accordingly, the Motion for Disclosure (Doc. 13) is denied.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this 21st day of March,
2018.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?