Ortego v. Hayden et al
Filing
30
ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights claims regarding the administrative remedy procedure and false disciplinary report be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). Plaintiff's claims against Steven Hayden regarding his placement on suicide watch and retaliation remain pending at this time. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 12/12/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SHREVEPORT DIVISION
BRANDON ORTEGO
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-56-P
VERSUS
JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.
STEVEN HAYDEN, ET AL.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting
the lack of written objections filed by Plaintiff and determining that the findings are
correct under the applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED IT that Plaintiff’s civil rights claims regarding the administrative
remedy procedure and false disciplinary report be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff’s claims against Steven Hayden regarding
his placement on suicide watch and retaliation remain pending at this time.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this the
12th day of December, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?