Ortego v. Hayden et al

Filing 30

ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights claims regarding the administrative remedy procedure and false disciplinary report be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). Plaintiff's claims against Steven Hayden regarding his placement on suicide watch and retaliation remain pending at this time. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 12/12/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION BRANDON ORTEGO CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-56-P VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. STEVEN HAYDEN, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY ORDER For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Plaintiff and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED IT that Plaintiff’s civil rights claims regarding the administrative remedy procedure and false disciplinary report be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff’s claims against Steven Hayden regarding his placement on suicide watch and retaliation remain pending at this time. THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this the 12th day of December, 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?