Passaniti v. Rogers
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 44 Report and Recommendations denying and dismissing with prejudice 29 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Linda Kate Keeney Passaniti. FURTHER ORDERED that Passaniti's 30 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is denied as moot. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 7/7/2017. (crt,McDonnell, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LINDA KATE KEENEY PASSANITI
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0281-P
JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES
For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with
the Magistrate Judge’s findings under the applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Habeas Corpus (Record Document 29) filed
by Petitioner Linda Kate Keeney Passaniti (“Passaniti”) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Passaniti’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel
(Record Document 30) is DENIED as MOOT.
Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District
Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters
a final order adverse to the applicant. The court, after considering the record in this case
and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of appealability
because the applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 7th day of July, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?