Wade v. Asset Management Services Group L L C et al

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM ORDER. Plaintiff has not yet filed any motions for default judgment. The court now sets February 5, 2018 as the deadline for filing any motions for default judgment. Failure to timely file such a motion with respect to a defaulte d defendant may result in the claims against that defendant being dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff does not wish to pursue her claims against Ms. Kabanova or any other party, she should file a stipulation of dismissal or motion for voluntary dismissal. Compliance Deadline set for 2/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 1/5/2018. (crt,Crick, S)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION DENISE WADE CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-cv-1291 VERSUS JUDGE HICKS ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP, LLC, ET AL MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff filed this civil action against several defendants. She settled with some. Of the others, the only defendant to file an answer is Natalia Kabanova. A default has been entered against the other non-settling defendants. The court set deadlines for the completion of discovery and the filing of any motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with respect to the claims by Plaintiff against Ms. Kabanova. Doc. 32. The November 3, 2017 deadline for dispositive motions has passed, and no such motions have been filed. The next step with respect to the claims against Ms. Kabanova will be to set deadlines for the filing of a pretrial order, proposed jury instructions, and other matters related to the jury trial demanded by Plaintiff. Before taking those steps, the court would like to see the other outstanding claims resolved. In August 2017, the court directed Plaintiff to, within a reasonable time, file a motion or motions for default judgment with respect to the several defaulted defendants. Doc. 32. The order directed that the “motion(s) should be fully supported by affidavits, documentation or other evidence sufficient to prove the validity of service of process, the liability of defendant(s), and the extent of damages suffered. The motion(s) shall be supported by a memorandum that explains the legal basis for liability and damages, and that states whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary under the rules explained in Leedo Cabinetry v. James Sales & Distribution, Inc., 157 F.3d 410, 414 (5th Cir. 1998). The motion(s) must be accompanied by a proposed judgment.” Plaintiff has not yet filed any motions for default judgment. The court now sets February 5, 2018 as the deadline for filing any motions for default judgment. Failure to timely file such a motion with respect to a defaulted defendant may result in the claims against that defendant being dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff does not wish to pursue her claims against Ms. Kabanova or any other party, she should file a stipulation of dismissal or motion for voluntary dismissal. THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 5th day of January, 2018. Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?