Campbell v. Evans et al

Filing 12

JUDGMENT: Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED THAT this matter be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the instant complaint constitutes a second or successive habeas petition within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) filed w ithout prior authorization of the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions, specifically Record Documents 3 , 5 , 6 , 8 , [9,] and 10 , are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 7/17/2017. (crt,ThomasSld, T)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION WINFRED CAMPBELL CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0023-P VERSES JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. JEREMY M. EVANS, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES JUDGMENT For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (Record Document 11), noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law; Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT this matter be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because the instant complaint constitutes a second or successive habeas petition within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. ยง 2244(b) filed without prior authorization of the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions, specifically Record Documents 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10, are DENIED AS MOOT. THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, on this the 17th day of July, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?