Caldwell Wholesale Company L L C v. R J Reynolds Tobacco Co
MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding diversity jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 02/22/2017. (crt,Crick, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
CALDWELL WHOLESALE CO., LLC
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-cv-0200
R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY
Caldwell Wholesale Company, LLC filed this civil action based on an assertion of
diversity jurisdiction. The court issued an order and directed Caldwell to amend its
complaint to set forth sufficient facts to meet its burden of establishing complete diversity
of citizenship. Caldwell has now filed an amended complaint that alleges the state of
incorporation and principal place of business of R J Reynolds. The amended complaint also
alleges that Caldwell has a single member, an LLP. The LLP is alleged to have an LLC as
a general partner, and two individuals and a trust are limited partners. The single member
of the LLC and trustee of the trust are also individuals.
Each individual is alleged to be “an individual major resident of Caddo Parish.” But
it is domicile rather than mere residency that decides citizenship for diversity purposes, and
“[i]t is well established that an allegation of residency does not satisfy the requirement of an
allegation of citizenship.” Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley, 313 F.3d 305, 310 n.
2 (5th Cir. 2002), quoting Strain v. Harrelson Rubber Co., 742 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1984).
A person may have multiple residences, but he has only one legal domicile at a time.
The court will deem the allegations of Louisiana residency to be allegations that those
individuals are citizens/domiciliaries of Louisiana unless Caldwell states otherwise in the
jurisdiction portion of the case management report. Instructions for the report will issue after
the defendant has filed an answer.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 22nd day of February,
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?