Yor Wic Construction Co Inc v. Engineering Design Technologies Inc

Filing 126

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 97 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 98 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 100 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 101 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 7/13/2020. (crt,McDonnell, D)

Download PDF
Case 5:17-cv-00224-SMH-KLH Document 126 Filed 07/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3693 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION YOR-WIC CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0224 VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. ENGINEERING DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES ORDER Based on the foregoing Memorandum Ruling, IT IS ORDERED that United Fire’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Record Document 98) is GRANTED and all claims asserted against it are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, EDT’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Record Document 97) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. EDT’s Motion is GRANTED as to Yor-Wic’s suspensive condition claim and Fidelity’s material alteration claim; thus, said claims, in addition to Yor-Wic’s counteroffer claim, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. EDT’s Motion is DENIED as to Yor-Wic’s subjective novation claim and Fidelity’s defense of late notice. Additionally, Yor-Wic’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Record Document 100) and Fidelity’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Record Document 101) are DENIED. THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 13th day of July, 2020.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?