Davis v. Caddo Parish et al
JUDGMENT adopting 76 Report and Recommendations, denying 79 Motion to Object to Judicial Review and Factual Findings; terminating all pending motions. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 4/26/2021. (crt,McDonnell, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DENNIS RAY DAVIS, JR.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1269-P
CHIEF JUDGE HICKS
WOODY WILSON, ET AL.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY
Considering the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed
herein (Record Document 76), and after an independent review of the record, including written
objections (Record Document 80) and a Motion to Object to Judicial Review and Factual Findings
(Record Document 79) filed by Plaintiff, and determining that the findings are correct under the
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s civil rights claims seeking monetary damages for his
allegedly unconstitutional convictions, sentences, and revocations be DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) until such time as the Heck conditions are
met. Plaintiff’s remaining civil rights claims are also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Object to Judicial
Review and Factual Findings (Record Document 79) is hereby DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action—insofar as it seeks the dismissal of the
criminal convictions, sentences, revocations and his immediate release—be DISMISSED for
failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted pursuant to Section 1983. All pending
motions in this matter are hereby TERMINATED.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 26th day of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?