Christaw v. Louisiana

Filing 8

JUDGMENT adopting 7 Report and Recommendations re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Cameron C Christaw. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court denies a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 10/9/2020. (crt,Keifer, K)

Download PDF
Case 5:19-cv-01381-EEF-MLH Document 8 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION CAMERON C. CHRISTAW CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1381-P VERSUS JUDGE FOOTE STATE OF LOUISIANA MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Petitioner and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. The court, after considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of appealability. Jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and whether this court was correct in its procedural ruling. See Slack v. McDaniel, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 1604 (2000). Case 5:19-cv-01381-EEF-MLH Document 8 Filed 10/13/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 74 THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 9th day of October, 2020. __________________________________ ELIZABETH ERNY FOOTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?