Parker v. Petsmart L L C et al
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM ORDER. If Judge Foote does not adopt the report and recommendation 40 and denies the motion for leave to add DD Carpet Cleaning as a defendant, then SMS Assist will be allowed 14 days from the entry of that order to file an amended answer or other submission that sets forth its citizenship information in detail in accordance with the referenced rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 9/19/2022. (crt,Keller, J)
Case 5:21-cv-03327-EEF-MLH Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 599
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SHREVEPORT DIVISION
PATRICIA PARKER
CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-cv-3327
VERSUS
JUDGE ELIZABETH E. FOOTE
PETSMART, LLC, ET AL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Plaintiff, who is a citizen of Louisiana, filed suit in state court against PetSmart, a
citizen of Delaware and Arizona.
PetSmart removed the case based on diversity
jurisdiction. Plaintiff earlier moved to amend and add new defendant SMS Assist, LLC.
The proposed amended complaint stated a belief that no member of SMS Assist is a citizen
of Louisiana. The court allowed the amendment but pointed out that there was not
sufficient information to determine the citizenship of SMS Assist. When a defendant is an
LLC, the record must include specific information about each of its members and their
citizenship. Settlement Funding, L.L.C. v. Rapid Settlements, Ltd., 851 F.3d 530, 536 (5th
Cir. 2017); Rodidaco, Inc. v. Chesapeake Energy Louisiana Corp. 2018 WL 3551525
(W.D. La. 2018).
The court allowed the amendment but reserved the right to vacate the order if it was
determined that SMS Assist has Louisiana citizenship and the Hensgens factors (which
govern the addition of a diversity-destroying defendant post-removal) were not satisfied.
Doc. 24. The order directed SMS Assist to include in its answer specific allegations of the
identity of its members and their citizenship. The court advised SMS Assist that the rules
Case 5:21-cv-03327-EEF-MLH Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 600
for determining the citizenship of an LLC, a corporation, a partnership, and an individual
can be found in Four W Trucking, LLC v. Nguyen, No. 22-CV-181, 2022 WL 243711
(W.D. La. Jan. 25, 2022).
SMS Assist has now filed an answer. Doc. 36. It states that SMS Assist is a foreign
LLC and “none of its members are citizens of Louisiana.” Its corporate disclosure
statement (Doc. 39) identifies three LLCs that each own more than 10% of SMS Assist.
That information is not sufficient to determine the citizenship of SMS Assist for purposes
of diversity jurisdiction. SMS Assist will have to identify each of its members and allege
their citizenship, which will require going through all organizational levels in detail. The
mere assertion that no member of SMS Assist is a citizen of Louisiana is not sufficient.
Settlement Funding, 851 F.3d at 536; Rodidaco, Inc., 2018 WL 3551525 at *1. Such
general assertions have often proven to be incorrect.
The court has issued a recommendation that Plaintiff be allowed to amend and add
new defendant DD Carpet Cleaning and Janitorial Services, LLC. The addition of that
defendant, if allowed, will destroy diversity jurisdiction and require remand no matter the
citizenship of SMS Assist. That would render moot the need for SMS Assist to set forth
its citizenship in detail. Accordingly, the court will not require such information be
provided now.
If Judge Foote does not adopt the report and recommendation and denies the motion
for leave to add DD Carpet Cleaning as a defendant, then SMS Assist will be allowed 14
days from the entry of that order to file an amended answer or other submission that sets
forth its citizenship information in detail in accordance with the referenced rules.
Page 2 of 3
Case 5:21-cv-03327-EEF-MLH Document 41 Filed 09/19/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 601
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 19th day of
September, 2022.
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?