Williams v. Caddo Correctional Center

Filing 37

JUDGMENT adopting 34 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's excessive force claim against E.R.T. Riley is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely, frivolous, and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 11/14/2023. (crt,Keifer, K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION GRANDVILLE DEWAYNE WILLIAMS CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-0611 SECTION P VS. JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. CADDO CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ET AL. MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY JUDGMENT The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections (Record Document 36) thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Grandville Dewayne Williams’s excessive force claim against E.R.T. Riley is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely, frivolous, and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted. THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 14th day of November, 2023. ______________________________________ JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?