Williams v. Caddo Correctional Center
Filing
37
JUDGMENT adopting 34 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's excessive force claim against E.R.T. Riley is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely, frivolous, and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 11/14/2023. (crt,Keifer, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SHREVEPORT DIVISION
GRANDVILLE DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-0611
SECTION P
VS.
JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.
CADDO CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY
JUDGMENT
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together
with the written objections (Record Document 36) thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de
novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is
correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff Grandville Dewayne
Williams’s excessive force claim against E.R.T. Riley is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s
remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely, frivolous, and for failing
to state claims on which relief may be granted.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 14th day of November, 2023.
______________________________________
JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?