McZeal v. Southern Consumers Coop Inc et al

Filing 108

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 102 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that, with respect to the plaintiff's ERISA claims, the sate court judgment has no preclusive effect under either the principle of res judicata (claim p;reclusion) or under the principle of issue preclusion (collateral estoppel). Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 05/07/09. (crt,Guidry, C)

Download PDF
RECEIVED NAY - j UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1080 JUDGE DOHERTY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILL 12009 TONY A MOORE CLERK WESTERN O!STAIcT OF LCUISrANA LAFAYETTE LOU~SJANA ALFRED MCZEAL, SR. VS. SOUTHERN CONSUMERS COOP, INC., ET AL. JUDGMENT No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation United States Magistrate Judge C. Michael Hill. The Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is correct and therefore adopts the conclusions set forth therein. Accordingty; IT IS ORDERED that, with respect to plaintiffs ERISA claims, the state court judgment has no preclusive effect under either the principle of res judicata (claim preclusion) or under the principle of issue preclusion (collateral estoppel). 7 THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this day of UNITED DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?