Wilks v. Social Security Administration
ORDER re 18 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Within the next 14 days from the date of this order, the parties are invited to submit any briefs and/or evidence as outlined in this order. Counsel shall provide a copy of any brief to chambers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mildred E Methvin on 4/11/2009. (crt,Keifer, K)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE-OPELOUSAS DIVISION GARY W. WILKS VS. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1229 JUDGE HAIK MAGISTRATE JUDGE METHYIN
ORDER Before the court is a Petition for Attorney Fees filed by appellant Gary W. Wilks pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 unopposed. The EAJA provides in relevant part that the amount of fees awarded: shall be based upon prevailing market rates for the kind and quality of the services furnished, except that. attorney fees shall not be awarded in excess of $125 per hour unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor justifies a higher fee.
.. . . .
U.S.C. § 2412. (Rec. Doc. 18). The motion is
§ 2412(d)(2)(A)(ii). The EAJA "vests the district courts with discretion to arrive at a
reasonable rate for attorneys' fees based on cost-of-living adjustments and other factors." Yoes v.
Barnhart, 467 F.3d 426, 426 (5th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted). Although courts are clearly
authorized to figure cost of living increases into the hourly rate, heretofore, courts within this district have regularly declined to award EAJA fees in excess of $125 per hour. See e.g.,
Richards v. Astrue, 2008 WL 4544374 (W. D. La. Oct. 7, 2008) (and cases cited therein).
However, when a given locale has experienced a significant change in the cost of living, the court should increase the hourly rate beyond the nominal statutory cap. Baker v. Bowen, 839 F.2d 1075, 1084 (5th Cir. 1988). The rate need not precisely track the cost of living increase for the
2 geographical area, but instead should be calculated "only to the extent necessary to ensure an adequate source of representation." Id. According to the undersigned's rudimentary calculations, the cost of living in this area has increased between 34 and 38.28 percent between March 1996 when the $125 cap was implemented, and December 2008, the year when the instant services were rendered. See,
Richards, supra (claimant argued that CPI increased by 34.89 percent through December 2007).!
This change is not insignificant. Increasing the $125 statutory cap by 34 to 38.28 percent would result in an hourly rate of $167.50 to $172.85. Absent other circumstances, however, the original $125 per hour reflected the maximum rate to be awarded under the EAJA. Thus, the CPI adjusted rate range of $167.50 to $172.85 contemplates the maximum rate that could be awarded today
assuming the court's calculations are correct. Baker, supra (increased rate may never
exceed the percentage by which the market rate increased since statute enacted). Upon due consideration of prevailing market conditions and the healthy community of social security practitioners in this area, the court is inclined to implement an hourly rate of $150 per hour for legal services performed in 2008 forward for this, and future EAJA petitions. See,
Brown v. Astrue, 2008 WL 4186877 (E.D. La. Sept. 9,2008) (settling upon an hourly rate of
$150). Accordingly, within the next 14 days from the date of this order, the parties are invited to
In Zamora v. Astrue, the court calculated the cost of living adjustment by comparing the Consumer Price Index (`CPI') for March 1996, the year in which the $125 EAJA rate became effective, with the CPI for the period when the services were rendered. Zamora v. Astrue, 2009 WL 311312 *6, nl (S. D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2009). To discern the percentage CPI increase, the court subtracted the March 1996 CPI for All Urban Consumers (155.7) from the then current CPI and divided the difference by the March 1996 CPI for All Urban Consumers (155.7). Id. In the case sub judice, the March 1996 CPI for all Urban Consumers in the South was 152.4; the annual 2008 CPI for All Urban Consumers was 2 15.303, and the annual 2008 CPI for all Urban Consumers in the South was 208.681. See, http://data. bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?cu. Depending on whether the national or southern CPIs are used, or a combination thereof, the CPI has increased by 34.03 percent (208.681-155.7 / 155.7); 38.28 percent (215.303-155.7 / 155.7); or 36.93 percent (208.681-152.4 / 152.4) since March 1996. This CPI change would increase the $125 cap to between $167.54 and $172.85.
3 submit any briefs and/or evidence relative to this issue. Counsel shall provide a copy of any brief to the chambers of the undersigned.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed at Lafayette, Louisiana, on April 11, 2009.
jidred E. Methvin United States Magistrate Judge 800 Lafayette St., Suite 3500 Lafayette Louisiana 70501
(337) 593 5140(phone) 593 5155 (fax)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?