Damond v. Lafayette City Police Dept et al
ORDER: Review of the plaintiffs' complaint reveals that the plaintiffs have satisfied the heightened pleading requirements. Thus, no Rule 7(a) order will be entered in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Michael Hill on 12/14/2009. (crt,Keifer, K)
U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA L A F A Y E T T E -O P E L O U S A S DIVISION S H A N E DIAMOND, ET AL. V S. LAFAYETTE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, E T AL. ORDER Review of the complaint reveals that plaintiffs have sued defendant Michael A n th o n y Millazo in his individual capacity and that this defendant has asserted the d e f en s e of qualified immunity in his answer to the complaint. Thus, the heightened p lea d in g requirements are applicable. See Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 195 (5th Cir. 1 9 9 6 ). Review of the plaintiffs' complaint reveals that the plaintiffs have satisfied the h e ig h te n e d pleading requirements. Thus, no Rule 7(a) order will be entered in this case. S ig n e d this 14 th day of December, 2009 at Lafayette, Louisiana. * C I V I L ACTION NO. 09-1236 * J U D G E HAIK * M A G I S T R A T E JUDGE HILL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?