Damond v. Lafayette City Police Dept et al
Filing
7
ORDER: Review of the plaintiffs' complaint reveals that the plaintiffs have satisfied the heightened pleading requirements. Thus, no Rule 7(a) order will be entered in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Michael Hill on 12/14/2009. (crt,Keifer, K)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE-OPELOUSAS DIVISION SHANE DIAMOND, ET AL. VS. LAFAYETTE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL. ORDER Review of the complaint reveals that plaintiffs have sued defendant Michael Anthony Millazo in his individual capacity and that this defendant has asserted the defense of qualified immunity in his answer to the complaint. Thus, the heightened pleading requirements are applicable. See Baker v. Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 195 (5th Cir. 1996). Review of the plaintiffs' complaint reveals that the plaintiffs have satisfied the heightened pleading requirements. Thus, no Rule 7(a) order will be entered in this case. Signed this 14th day of December, 2009 at Lafayette, Louisiana. *CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1236 *JUDGE HAIK *MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILL
C. MiCUAEI. FuLL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
