Caffey et al v. Domingue et al
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM RULING: RULE 7(a) HEIGHTENED PLEADING REVIEW. Although the Court may later determine the facts in favor of the defendants, the sole issue presented here is whether the plaintiffs have satisfied the heightened pleading requirement of Shult ea v Wood. The undersigned concludes that they have. Accordingly, the undersigned concludes that there is no need for an order banning or limiting discovery with regard to the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants, and the case should proceed in accordance with the existing Scheduling Order ( Rec Doc 6). Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 02/22/11. (crt,Yocum, M)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
