Walker v. Astrue
Filing
13
JUDGMENT ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative action. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 3/22/12. (crt,Brazell, G)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAFAYETTE DIVISION
PATRICK WALKER
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11-cv-00080
VERSUS
JUDGE MELANÇON
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA
JUDGMENT
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report
and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of
any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation
[Rec. Doc. 12] is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own.
Accordingly, it is therefore
ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and
REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative action pursuant to the fourth
sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1 This includes, but does not limit, sending the case to the
hearing level with instructions to the Administrative Law Judge to order an updated
consultative examination of the claimant or an evaluation by the claimant's treating physician,
specifically regarding the effect that the claimant’s severe impairments have on his ability
1
A fourth sentence remand constitutes a “final judgment” that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee
application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 2631 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552 (5 th
Cir. 1993).
to walk and/or stand for prolonged periods of time. The claimant shall be afforded the
opportunity to submit additional evidence and to testify at a supplemental hearing.
Signed at Lafayette, Louisiana, this 22 nd day of March, 2012.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?