Leger v. Offshore Staffing Services of Acadiana L L C
Filing
44
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 41 Report and Recommendations,and denying 27 Motion for Contempt. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff, Michael H. Leger, and against defendant, Offshore Staffing Services of Acadiana, Inc. , in the principal sum of $20,910.16 as of February 15, 2012, and accruing at the rate of $25.00 per day thereafter, until paid in full, plus pre-judgment interest from the date of judicial demand to the date of entryof this Judgment and post-judgment interest from the date of entry of this Judgment at the federal rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a).Signed by Judge Tucker L Melancon on February 15, 2012. (crt,Bacon, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAFAYETTE DIVISION
Leger
Civil Action No. 11-1539
versus
Judge Tucker L. Melançon
Offshore Staffing Services of Acadiana
Magistrate Judge C. Michael Hill
JUDGMENT
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge C. Michael Hill for Report
and Recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any
objections, this Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Motion For Contempt filed by plaintiff, Michael H. Leger, [Rec.
Doc. 27] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff, Michael
H. Leger, and against defendant, Offshore Staffing Services of Acadiana, Inc., in the principal
sum of $20,910.16 as of February 15, 2012, and accruing at the rate of $25.00 per day thereafter,
until paid in full, plus pre-judgment interest from the date of judicial demand to the date of entry
of this Judgment and post-judgment interest from the date of entry of this Judgment at the federal
rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a).
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, this 15th day of February, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?