Mason et al v. Lafayette et al
Filing 91
ORDER: Plaintiffs have already had an opportunity to make this factual argument, and the Court sees no reason to permit them a second bite at the apple. As such, "the facts in this case do not warrant the extraordinary relief associated with the granting of a motion for reconsideration." Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 74 Motion for Reconsideration and/or Motion for New Trial is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard T Haik, Sr on 3/17/2014. (crt,Putch, A)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
