Gayneaux et al v. National Oilwell Varco, LP
Filing
13
JURISDICTIONAL ORDER : Upon review of the parties submissions, the undersigned finds that the plaintiff has sustained his burden of proving that this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Additionally, although the plaint iff did not expressly plead an alternative basis of jurisdiction in his complaint, his allegation that the accident underlying the lawsuitoccurred on a fixed platform on the Outer Continental Shelf (Rec. Doc. 1 at 7), which was confirmed by the defendant (Rec. Doc. 12 at 1), affords federal question jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 5/14/13. (crt,Kennedy, T) (Main Document 13 replaced on 5/14/2013) (Kennedy, T).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAFAYETTE DIVISION
KENNETH GAYNEAUX AND
SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:13-cv-00637
VERSUS
JUDGE HAIK
NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, LP
MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA
JURISDICTIONAL ORDER
The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction
over this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because the parties are diverse in citizenship
and the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000.00. The undersigned reviewed the
pleadings and found that the requirements for diversity jurisdiction were not satisfied.
The undersigned ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing subject matter
jurisdiction. (Rec. Doc. 7). The parties complied. (Rec. Doc. 11, Rec. Doc. 12).
Upon review of the parties’ submissions, the undersigned finds that the
plaintiff has sustained his burden of proving that this Court has subject-matter
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Additionally, although the plaintiff did not expressly plead an alternative basis
of jurisdiction in his complaint, his allegation that the accident underlying the lawsuit
occurred on a fixed platform on the Outer Continental Shelf (Rec. Doc. 1 at ¶ 7),
which was confirmed by the defendant (Rec. Doc. 12 at 1), affords federal question
jurisdiction.1
Signed at Lafayette, Louisiana, this 14th day of May 2013.
____________________________________
PATRICK J. HANNA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
43 U.S.C. § 1349(b)(1). See, e.g., Cutting Underwater Technologies USA, Inc.
v. Eni U.S. Operating Co., 671 F.3d 512, 517 (5th Cir. 2012); Dahlen v. Gulf Crews, Inc., 281
F.3d 487, 492 (5th Cir. 2002); Hufnagel v. Omega Service Industries, Inc., 182 F.3d 340, 353
(5th Cir. 1999).
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?