Romero v. Youngsville et al
Filing 85
JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in this Courts Ruling 84 , and for the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted, and after an independent review of the entire record and the written objec tions and responses filed herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 47] is DENIED. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 29] is GRAN TED IN PART and DEFERRED IN PART. To the extent that Defendants move for summary judgment on Plaintiffs federal claims, the motion is GRANTED, and the federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. To the extent that Defendants move for summary judgme nt on Plaintiffs state law claims, the Court DEFERS either ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment as to those claims or declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims until the pending motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 79] is fully resolved. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/16/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.