Cortez v. Neustrom et al
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 57 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, 16 , 19 , and 22 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. The alternative 16 Motion for More Definite Statement is DENIED as MOOT, and Plaintiffs claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 2/9/17. (crt,Crawford, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
CATHERINE CORTEZ, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15-CV-0467
JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES
MICHAEL W. NEUSTROM, ET AL.
MAG. JUDGE CAROL B. WHITEHURST
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Carol B. Whitehurst
for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence
of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation is
correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, consistent with
the report and recommendation, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 16, 19, and 22) are
GRANTED, the alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Doc. 16) is DENIED as MOOT,
and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Signed at Monroe, Louisiana, this 9th day of February, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?