J H v. Neustrom et al

Filing 47

ORDER ADOPTING 46 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 12/29/2016. (crt,Dauterive, C)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION J.H. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15-2525 VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. MICHAEL W. NEUSTROM, Individually and in his official capacity as the duly elected SHERIFF OF LAFAYETTE PARISH, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA ORDER This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for Report and Recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike (Record Document 39), which was filed on behalf of defendants Neustrom, Reardon, and Willis, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. More particularly, it is ordered that: • the Motion to Strike is GRANTED with regard to Paragraphs 25, 26, and 102 through 108 of the amended complaint and DENIED with regard to all other paragraphs of the amended complaint, and Paragraphs 25, 26, and 102 through 108 are stricken from the amended complaint; • the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with regard to any claims asserted in the amended complaint against defendants Willis or Doe and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; • the Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff’s punitive damages claims is GRANTED with regard to the plaintiff’s official-capacity claims against Neustrom and Reardon and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; • the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with regard to the official-capacity claims against Reardon and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; • the Motion to Dismiss the individual-capacity claims against Reardon is DENIED AS MOOT and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; • the Motion to Dismiss the individual-capacity claims against Neustrom is GRANTED and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and • the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects, consistent with the Report and Recommendation. THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 29th day of December, 2016. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?