Camara v. Ramos
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Directing plaintiff to amend complaint/petition. Pro Se Response due by 8/31/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol B Whitehurst on 8/1/2016. (crt,Chicola, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAFAYETTE DIVISION
TOMAS CAMARA (#A204-589-251)
DOCKET NO. 6:16-cv-779; SEC. P
VERSUS
JUDGE FOOTE
DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY
MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Before the Court is a petition for writ of habeas corpus (28 U.S.C. § 2241) filed by pro se
Petitioner Tomas Camara. Petitioner is an immigration detainee in the custody of the Department
of Homeland Security/Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (DHS/ICE), housed at the
Houston Processing Center in Houston, Texas. At the time of filing his petition on June 7, 2016,
Petitioner was incarcerated at the Pine Prairie Detention Center in Pine Prairie, Louisiana. Petitioner
challenges his continued detention under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
This matter has been referred to the undersigned for review, report, and recommendation in
accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the standing orders of the Court.
Procedural History
Petitioner is a native and citizen of Guinea. He entered the United States on September 1,
1998, in New York City as a B-2 visitor. (Doc. 1, p. 15). Petitioner failed to depart. On April 22,
2014, Petitioner was convicted of marijuana distribution in the District Court for Fairfax County,
Virginia. (Doc. 1, p. 15). On March 5, 2015, Petitioner was convicted of fourth degree burglary in
the Circuit Court of Worcester County, Maryland. (Doc. 1, p. 15).
On March 30, 2015, Petitioner was issued a notice to appear. On July 8, 2015, an
immigration judge ordered Petitioner removed. (Doc. 1, p. 15). Petitioner reserved his right to
appeal, but did not file an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals. Thus, his order of removal
became final on August 8, 2015. (Doc. 1, p. 15). Petitioner has remained in DHS/ICE custody since
that date. He received custody reviews on December 2, 2015, January 20, 2016, and May 19, 2016.
(Doc. 1, p. 15-17).
According to Petitioner’s custody review documents, a travel document was requested from
the Guinea government, and is expected to be issued. (Doc. 1, p. 15-17).
Instructions to Amend
Petitioner claims that his continued detention is unconstitutional under Zadvydas v. Davis,
533 U.S. 678, 701 (2001). Under Zadvydas, it is presumptively constitutional for an alien to be
detained for six months following a final order of removal. Id. After the expiration of the six-month
period, an alien may seek his release from custody by demonstrating a “good reason to believe that
there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.” Agyei-Kodie v.
Holder, 418 F. App’x 317, 318 (5th Cir. 2011). Not every alien in custody will be entitled to
automatic release after the expiration of the six-month period under the scheme announced in
Zadvydas.
In Andrade v. Gonzales, 459 F.3d 538 (5th Cir. 2006), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
reiterated that the Supreme Court’s holding in Zadvydas creates no specific limits on detention. In
fact, an alien may be held in confinement until it has been determined that there is no significant
likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future. Id. at 543 (citing Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at
701). The alien bears the initial burden of proof to show that no such likelihood of removal
exists. Id.
IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner amend his complaint within thirty (30) days of the filing
of this Order to provide factual allegations demonstrating that there is no significant likelihood of
2
his removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.
Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action under Rule
41(b) or 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Petitioner is further required to notify the Court of any change in his address under
Rule 41.3 of the Local Rules for the Western District of Louisiana.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in chambers in Lafayette, Louisiana, this 1st day of August,
2016.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?