Ned v. Eunice et al

Filing 39

JUDGMENT granting 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's claims against the Eunice Police Department are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 4 and 23 Motions to Dismiss fo r Failure to State a Claim are GRANTED to the extent that Defendants move the Court to dismiss Plaintiff's § 1983 and state law claims of false arrest and false imprisonment and Plaintiffs claims under the Fifth, Eighth, and Ninth Amendments. The motions are otherwise DENIED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Chief Fontenot is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 1/23/17. (crt,Crawford, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION LIONEL NED, JR. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1035 VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT G. JAMES EUNICE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL. MAG. JUDGE CAROL B. WHITEHURST JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Ruling and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to the extent adopted, and having considered the entire record in this matter, including the written objections and responses to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that EPD’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims against the EPD are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Chief Fontenot, Officer Frank, and Officer Mott’s Motions to Dismiss [Doc. Nos. 4 & 23] are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent Defendants move the Court to dismiss Plaintiff’s § 1983 and state law claims of false arrest and false imprisonment and Plaintiff’s claims under the Fifth, Eighth, and Ninth Amendments, the motions are GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motions are otherwise DENIED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Chief Fontenot’s separate Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 9] is DENIED. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 23rd day of January, 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?