Columbian Chemicals Co v. Gear Reducer Services L L C
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. The Plaintiff's 7 Motion to Remand is DENIED. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette Division. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 7/12/2017.]
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
COLUMBIAN CHEMICALS COMPANY,
GEAR REDUCER SERVICES, LLC, et al.,
July 11, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-cv-1617
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
Pending before the Court is the plaintiff’s, Columbian Chemicals Company (the
“plaintiff”), motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 7). In its motion, the plaintiff argues that the abovestyled civil action was improperly removed to this Court in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a),1
and seeks an Order from this Court remanding the action to the 16th Judicial District Court for
the Parish of St. Mary, Louisiana, where it was originally filed and assigned Case No. 130976
Div. “F”. (Id.). The defendants, Gear Reducer Services, LLC, Thomas Frank, and Victor Frank
(collectively, the “defendants”), in their response filed in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion to
remand, do not dispute that venue of this action is improper here, but rather maintain that venue
is proper in the District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette Division--the
federal district court embracing the place where the action was originally filed. (See Dkt. No. 9).
As such, the defendants contend that this Court should deny the plaintiff’s motion to remand and
28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) provides as follows:
Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a
State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be
removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the
district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.
28 U.S.C.A. § 1441(a)
transfer this action to the Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette Division, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1406(a). This Court agrees.
The parties do not dispute that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this
controversy in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1332, given the amount in controversy and the
parties’ diversity of citizenship. (See Dkt. No. 7-1 at 3; see also Dkt. No. 9 at 3). However,
where, as here, venue is placed in the wrong division or district, a district court may, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), raise the issue of venue sua sponte. See Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., Inc.,
886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir. 1989). Specifically, § 1406(a) provides that “[the] district court of a
district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it
be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have
been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Further, the Fifth Circuit has instructed, when “there is no
doubt that the district court ha[s] subject matter jurisdiction,” “removal to the wrong division [or
district] is procedural, not jurisdictional.” Kreimerman v. Casa Veerkamp, S.A. de C.V., 22 F.3d
634, 645 (5th Cir. 1994) (citations omitted). Under such circumstances, a district court should
“transfer[ ] the case to the [correct] division [or district] under the authority of 28 U.S.C. §
1406(a).” Kreimerman, 22 F.3d at 645; see also S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc., 72 F.3d 489,
493 n.3 (5th Cir. 1996) (“When a case is removed to the wrong district, the mistake does not
require remand and the interest of justice requires that the action be transferred to the district
court of proper venue.”) (internal citation omitted).
Based on the aforementioned authority, the plaintiff’s motion to remand is DENIED.
Accordingly, this case, having been improvidently removed from the 16th Judicial District Court
for the Parish of St. Mary, Louisiana to the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Texas, Houston Division, is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for
the Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette Division, the district court to which it should have
All other relief not expressly granted is also DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED on this 11th day of July, 2017.
Kenneth M. Hoyt
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?