Babaoye v. South Louisiana Community College, et al

Filing 89

MEMORANDUM RULING re 82 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Board of Supervisors of Louisiana Community & Technical College System, Natalie Harder. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, Re c. Doc 82, is GRANTED; That the hearing in this matter set for August 19, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. is CANCELLED, along with all other proceedings and deadlines contained in the Courts previous Scheduling Order, Rec. Doc. 78, that have not yet passed; and, That the Plaintiffs claims, and this matter, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, at Plaintiffs cost. Signed by Judge Michael J Juneau on 7/22/2021. (crt,Guidry, C)

Case 6:17-cv-00960-MJJ-CBW Document 89 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 723

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LAFAYETTE DIVISION
MARCUS S. BABAOYE

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-00960

VERSUS

JUDGE JUNEAU

SOUTH LOUISIANA COMMUNITY MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST
COLLEGE, ET AL
MEMORANDUM RULING
Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Board of
Supervisors of Louisiana Community & Technical College System and Natalie
Harder, Rec. Doc. 82. Noting that there was no timely opposition to the motion,1 the
Court has reviewed the record in the case, including the pleadings, the Plaintiff and
Defendant Harder’s depositions, the instant motion, the submitted evidence, and the
relevant law to reassure itself of the propriety of the motion before granting summary
judgment. Having done so, the Court finds that the instant motion is valid in its
conclusion that the Plaintiff has not shown the existence of a genuine issue of
material fact. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
“A motion for summary judgment cannot be granted simply because there is no opposition, even if the failure to
oppose violated a local rule. The movant has the burden of establishing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact,
and unless he has done so, the court may not grant the motion, regardless of whether any response was filed.” Hetzel
v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. 50 F.3d 360, 362 (5th Cir. 1995). However, in light of the Plaintiff’s failure to file a timely
opposition and statement of contested material facts, the Court deems the Defendants’ statement of uncontested
material facts, Rec. Doc. 82-2, admitted for purposes of the motion. Local Rule 56.2W.
1

Case 6:17-cv-00960-MJJ-CBW Document 89 Filed 07/22/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 724

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Rec. Doc 82, is GRANTED;
That the hearing in this matter set for August 19, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. is
CANCELLED, along with all other proceedings and deadlines contained in the
Court’s previous Scheduling Order, Rec. Doc. 78, that have not yet passed; and,
That the Plaintiff’s claims, and this matter, are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE, at Plaintiff’s cost.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 22nd day of
July, 2021.

MICHAEL J. JUNEAU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2