McLemore et al v. Garber et al

Filing 122

JUDGMENT adopting 120 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Advantage Medical Professionals, LLC, Cynthia Wiltz, Shelly Samuel, Randel Bernard, Mona Bergaux, and Wilhelmina Clay [the Advantage defendants], Rec. Doc. 90 , is GRANTED, as follows.IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss plaintiffs Section 1983 claims against the Advantage defendants for deliberate indifference to Walkers serious medical needs is GRANTED, and these claims are DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss plaintiffs Monell claims against the Advantage defendants for unconstitutional policies related to (a) suicide assessment and prevention, (b) lack of pro tocols to identify evidence of extreme intoxication or drug abuse, (c) inadequate staffing, (d) monitoring, and (e) training (Monell claims) is GRANTED, and these claims are DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss plaintiffs state law claims for medical malpractice tort against the Advantage defendants is GRANTED, and these claims are DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as this Court declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over these claims. Signed by Judge Michael J Juneau on 6/3/2021. (crt,Guidry, C)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION CRYSTAL MCLEMORE, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-0751 VERSUS JUDGE JUNEAU MARK GARBER, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST JUDGMENT For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, and considering the lack of written objections filed, and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Advantage Medical Professionals, LLC, Cynthia Wiltz, Shelly Samuel, Randel Bernard, Mona Bergaux, and Wilhelmina Clay [“the Advantage defendants”], Rec. Doc. 90, is GRANTED, as follows. IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Section 1983 claims against the Advantage defendants for deliberate indifference to Walker’s serious medical needs is GRANTED, and these claims are DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Monell claims against the Advantage defendants for unconstitutional policies related to (a) suicide assessment and prevention, (b) lack of protocols to identify evidence of extreme intoxication or drug abuse, (c) inadequate staffing, (d) monitoring, and (e) training (Monell claims) is GRANTED, and these claims are DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ state law claims for medical malpractice tort against the Advantage defendants is GRANTED, and these claims are DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as this Court declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over these claims. THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, on this 3rd day of June, 2021. ______________________________ MICHAEL J. JUNEAU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?