SANDLER v. CALCAGNI et al

Filing 127

AFFIDAVIT of J. William Druary Jr. in support of Peter Mars' response to Booksurge's statement of additional material facts in opposition to plaintiff Shana Sandler's partial motion for summary judgment filed by PETERS MARS. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Peter Mars deposition)(DRUARY, J.)

Download PDF
SANDLER v. CALCAGNI et al Doc. 127 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ) SHANA SANDLER, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) vs. ) ) MIA CALCAGNI, RALPH CALCAGNI, ) MAUREEN CALCAGNI, PETER ) MARS, and BOOKSURGE, LCC, ) ) Defendants ) ) Case No. 1:07-cv-00029 DECLARATION OF J. WILLIAM DRUARY, JR., IN SUPPORT OF PETER MARS' RESPONSE TO BOOKSURGE, LLC'S STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF SHANA SANDLER'S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The undersigned, under penalty of perjury, declares as follows: 1. I hereby submit this Declaration in Support of Peter Mars' Response to Booksurge, LLC's Statement of Additional Material Facts, as filed by Booksurge in Opposition to Plaintiff Shana Sandler's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment. 2. I am a partner in the law firm of Marden, Dubord, Bernier & Stevens, counsel for Peter Mars in this case. I am over the age of 18, have personal knowledge of the facts herein, and am competent to testify thereto. 3. 4. Defendant Peter Mars was deposed on January 21, 2008. Attached as Exhibit A are excerpts of Mr. Mars deposition, which is referred to as Exhibit A in Mr. Mars' Response to Booksurge's Statement of Additional Material Facts. I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 14th day of April, 2008. Dockets.Justia.com /s/ J. William Druary Jr.____________________ J. William Druary, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Peter Mars Marden, Dubord, Bernier & Stevens 44 Elm Street; POB 708 Waterville, ME 04903-0708 (207) 873-0186

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?