SANDLER v. CALCAGNI et al

Filing 142

MOTION to Extend Time (Ten Days After Ruling on Motion to Strike) to Respond Pleading No. by SHANA SANDLERResponses due by 5/16/2008. (KUBETZ, BERNARD) Modified on 5/7/2008 to clean up the docket text (mjlt).

SANDLER v. CALCAGNI et al Doc. 142 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE SHANA SANDLER, Plaintiff v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:07-cv-00029 MIA CALCAGNI et al, Defendants PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS RALPH AND MAUREEN CALCAGNI'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Shana Sandler moves, pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 6(b), to enlarge the time to respond to Defendants Ralph and Maureen Calcagni's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 126) for ten days following a ruling on Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' summary judgment motion (Docket No. 135). Pending before this Court are Defendants' motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff's motion to strike this pleading. Plaintiff's motion to strike is based on the fact that the motion is untimely ­ filed more than a month past the Court's deadline for dispositive motions ­ and filed without prior leave of court. A decision granting Plaintiff's motion to strike will eliminate the need for a response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment and avoid a potentially unnecessarily pleading. Because a decision on Plaintiff's motion to strike would be dispositive of Defendants' motion, Plaintiff requests that the Court extend the period for Plaintiff to respond to this motion to ten (10) days following a decision on Plaintiff's motion to strike. Dockets.Justia.com WHEREFORE, Plaintiff moves to extend the time for her to respond to Defendants Ralph and Maureen Calcagni's Motion for Summary Judgment to ten (10) days following a ruling on Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' late summary judgment motion. Dated at Bangor, Maine, this 25th day of April, 2008. PLAINTIFF, Shana Sandler, By____/s/ Bernard J. Kubetz Bernard J. Kubetz, Esq. Michael R. Clisham, Esq. EATON PEABODY P. O. Box 1210 80 Exchange Street Bangor, Maine 04402-1210 (207) 947-0111 bkubetz@eatonpeabody.com mclisham@eatonpeabody.com 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Bernard J. Kubetz, hereby certify that on April 25, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Time to Respond to Defendants Ralph and Maureen Calcagni's Motion for Summary Judgment with the Clerk of the United States District Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following: Bruce Mallonee, Esq. Rudman & Winchell, LLC P. O. Box 1401 Bangor, Maine 04402-1401 bmallonee@rudman-winchell.com Steven P. Wright, Esq. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, Massachusetts 02111-2950 steven.wright@klgates.com Matthew J. Segal, Esq. Stephen A. Smith, Esq. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP 925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900 Seattle, Washington 98104-1158 matthew.segal@klgates.com J. William Druary, Jr., Esq. Marden, Dubord, Bernier & Stevens P. O. Box 708 Waterville, Maine 04903-0708 bdruary@mardendubord.com Harold J. Friedman, Esq. Friedman, Gaythwaite Wolf & Leavitt P. O. Box 4726 Portland, Maine 04112-4726 hfriedman@FGWL-law.com /s/ Bernard J. Kubetz_ Bernard J. Kubetz 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?