MILLAY v. SURRY SCHOOL DEPT

Filing 203

ORDER adopting 198 Amended Report and Recommended Decision re 44 Amended Complaint filed by JOANNE MILLAY. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JOANNE M. MILLAY, as Parent of minor child Y.M., Plaintiff, v. SURRY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:07-cv-00178-JAW ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on March 24, 2011 her Amended Recommended Decision (Docket # 198). The Defendant filed its objections to the Recommended Decision on April 6, 2011 (Docket # 199); the Plaintiff filed her objections to the Recommended Decision on April 11, 2011 (Docket # 200); the Defendant filed its response to the objections on April 25, 2011 (Docket # 201); and, the Plaintiff filed her response to the objections on April 28, 2011 (Docket # 202). The Court has reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and has made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Amended Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. Regarding remedy, the Court ORDERS eighty-six (86) weeks of compensatory educational services, to be provided by Defendant upon the expiration of Y.M.’s existing period of eligibility, unless the Department of Education directs that a substitute decision maker with expertise will fulfill Defendant’s IDEA obligations. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 23rd day of May, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?