VILLENEUVE v. CONNECTICUT, STATE OF et al

Filing 34

ORDER denying 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 28 Motion for Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 30 Emergency Motion for Order on Motion for Prelminary Injunction; adopting 32 Report and Recommended Decision for [ 17] Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by MARK VILLENEUVE, 28 Motion for Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by MARK VILLENEUVE, 30 Emergency Motion for Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by MARK VILLENEUVE. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MARK VILLENEUVE, Plaintiff, v. CONNECTICUT, STATE OF, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 09-13-B-W ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on April 8, 2009 her Recommended Decision. The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on April 9, 2009. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket # 17) be and hereby is DENIED. 3. It is further ORDERED that the Motion for Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket # 28) be and hereby is DENIED. 4. It is further ORDERED that the Emergency Motion for Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket # 30) be and hereby is DENIED. SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 9th day of April, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?