Filing 7

ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by DAVID CADIEUX; ORDER denying Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by DAVID CADIEUX. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22b-First Circuit Local rule 22.1. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DAVID CADIEUX, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 09-42-B-W Crim. No. 03-41-B-W ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 8, 2009 her Recommended Decision. The Plaintiff filed his request for de novo review of the Recommended Decision on May 21, 2009. The Court has reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and has conducted a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision. The Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determines that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (Docket # 5) is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2255 Petition (Docket # 1) be and hereby is DENIED. 3. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 22nd day of July, 2009 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?