HOFLAND v. LAHAYE et al

Filing 121

ORDER adopting 120 Report and Recommended Decision re: filing new pleadings filed by RANDALL B. HOFLAND. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
RANDALL B. HOFLAND,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD LAHAYE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:09-cv-00172-JAW

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended
Decision filed June 8, 2012, the Recommended Decision is accepted.
Accordingly, as the case is currently on appeal, the Court is without
jurisdiction to entertain the motion absent extraordinary circumstances, none
of which exists in this case. As the Motion to Vacate Judgment of Dismissal
is in any event patently frivolous, the Court directs the Clerk not to docket
the motion because it violates the Court’s January 12, 2012 Order, imposing
filing restrictions on Mr. Hofland.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 19th day of July, 2012