HOFLAND v. LAHAYE et al

Filing 56

ORDER denying 52 Motion for Recusal as to District Judge. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RANDALL B. HOFLAND, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD LaHAYE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV-09-172-B-W ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECUSE On November 10, 2010, Randall B. Hofland moved to recuse the United States Magistrate Judge and me and asked that the case be transferred to the Portland courthouse. Mot. to Recuse (Docket # 52) (Def.'s Mot.). The basis of his motion is that the commission of "egregious errors" and a "hostile and prejudicial tone that the Magistrate Judge used in her orders." Id. at 1-2. On November 4, 2010, the Magistrate Judge denied the motion as to herself. Order Denying Mot. to Amend and Mot. to Recuse Magistrate Judge (Docket # 55) (Order). Other than demanding my recusal, Mr. Hofland's motion does not say why I ­ as opposed to the Magistrate Judge - should be recused. Def.'s Mot. The Magistrate Judge surmises and I agree - that Mr. Hofland's likely rationale as against me is that I have affirmed decisions recommended by the Magistrate Judge. Order at 1. I deny Mr. Hofland's motion to recuse for the same reasons the Magistrate Judge denied the same motion as to her. Mr. Hofland alleges bias from current proceedings or prior proceedings and as a matter of law, "opinions formed by the judge on the basis of facts introduced during the course of the current proceedings, or of prior proceedings, do not constitute a basis for a bias or partiality motion unless they display a deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible." Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 548 (1994); United States v. Pulido, 566 F.3d 52, 63 (1st Cir. 2009). Mr. Hofland makes no allegation of extrajudicial bias against me. In fact, he makes no allegation against me at all, except by inference. His motion does not state a basis for recusal. I DENY Randall Hofland's Motion to Recuse (Docket # 52). SO ORDERED. /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr. JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 4th day of November, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?