ONE AND KEN VALLEY HOUSING GROUP et al v. MAINE STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY
Filing
129
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 116 Report and Recommendations for 87 Motion for Summary Judgment, 88 Motion for Summary Judgment, 89 Motion for Summary Judgment & 90 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
ONE AND KEN VALLEY HOUSING )
GROUP, ET AL.,
)
)
PLAINTIFFS
)
)
v.
)
)
MAINE STATE HOUSING
)
AUTHORITY,
)
)
)
DEFENDANT AND
THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF )
)
V.
)
)
SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary,
)
United States Department of
)
Housing & Urban Development, )
)
THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT )
CIVIL NO. 1:09-cv-642-DBH
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On April 17, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the
court, with copies to counsel, her Recommended Decision on the parties’
motions for summary judgment.
The plaintiffs filed their objection to the
Recommended Decision on May 4, 2012, and the defendant Maine State
Housing Authority filed its objection on the same date.
Oral argument was
held on July 16, 2012.
I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters
adjudicated
by
the
Recommended
Decision;
and
I
concur
with
the
recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set
forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding
is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Summary judgment is GRANTED to the defendants
Maine State Housing Authority and the United States Department for Housing
and Urban Development.
The plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is
DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2012
/s/D. Brock Hornby
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?