Thompson et al v. Miles et al

Filing 55

ORDER AFFIRMING 46 THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
MICHAEL THOMPSON
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL MILES AND
NANCY CLOUD,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil No. 1:10-cv-00234-NT

ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on December
30, 2011 her Recommended Decision and Order on Motion to Strike (Docket
No. 46). The Defendants filed their Objection to the Recommended Decision
(Docket No. 50) on January 13, 2012. The Plaintiff filed his Objection to the
Recommended Decision (Docket No. 51) on January 20, 2012. The Defendants
filed their Response to the Plaintiff’s objections (Docket No. 52) on February
3, 2012.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended
Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo
determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's
Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the
United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is
1

necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the
Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is further ORDERED that the Summary Judgment be
GRANTED to the Defendants on the remaining claims against
them -- Count I (breach of contract), Count III (fraud), Count IV
(negligent misrepresentation) and Count VI (unfair trade practice).
3. It is further ORDERED that the Defendant’s objection to the
Magistrate Judge’s order denying Defendant’s Motion to Strike is
OVERRULED.

SO ORDERED.
/s/ Nancy Torresen
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 30th day of March, 2012

2