HANNINGTON v. SUN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 34

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 31 Report and Recommendations. Denying 17 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA); granting 18 Motion for Judgment on the Record for Judicial Review (ERISA). By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DAVID HANNINGTON, Plaintiff, v. SUNLIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendantt. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 1:10-cv-00431-NT ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 14, 2011 her Recommended Decision (Docket No. 31). The Defendant filed its Objections to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 32) on October 28, 2012. Plaintiff filed his Response to the Defendant’s objections (Docket No. 33) on November 14, 2011. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment (Docket No. 18) is GRANTED. 3. It is further ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment is DENIED. 4. It is further ORDERED that the Defendant pay past and future benefits to the Plaintiff without any offset for the Plaintiff’s receipt of service-connected disability benefits. SO ORDERED. /s/ Nancy Torresen NANCY TORRESEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 15th day of December, 2011 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?