SCOVIL et al v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM INC

Filing 79

ORDER AFFIRMING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY ORDER re 71 Objection to 69 PRETRIAL DISCOVERY ORDER - By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE WAYNE SCOVIL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. d/b/a FedEx Home Delivery, DEFENDANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:10-CV-515-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY ORDER On December 16, 2011, I vacated the Magistrate Judge’s Order in a discovery dispute because it appeared that the plaintiffs had chosen not to contest the defendant’s objection to its limitation on the number of depositions. (Docket Item 74). However, on December 21, 2011, I granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file late. (Docket Item 77). Therefore the Magistrate Judge’s original Pretrial Discovery Order (Docket Item 69) is REINSTATED. Now I proceed to consider the defendant’s objection to deposition limits in the Order and the plaintiffs’ response. After reviewing all the papers, I conclude that the Magistrate Judge’s Order is eminently reasonable, and is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The objection is therefore overruled and the Pretrial Discovery Order is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011 /s/D. Brock Hornby D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?