FLOOD v. BARNHART

Filing 32

ORDER ON PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - denying 30 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 30 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
ANDREW FLOOD,
PETITIONER
v.
PATRICIA BARNHART, WARDEN,
MAINE STATE PRISON,
RESPONDENT

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL NO. 1:11-cv-32-DBH

ORDER ON PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
On July 5, 2011, I affirmed the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate
Judge denying the petition for § 2254 relief, denying the motion to appoint
counsel and reconsider the denial of bail, and denying the motion for hearing
and production of documents. On July 13, the petitioner filed his motion for
reconsideration of the denial of the § 2254 petition or, in the alternative, for
certificate of appealability.
The motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
The motion for certificate of appealability is DENIED because there is no
substantial issue that can be presented on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b);
First Circuit Local Rule 22.1.
SO ORDERED.
DATED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2011
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE