HOFLAND v. LAHAYE et al

Filing 25

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER Affirming the Recommended Decision of teh Magistrate Judge By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jgw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
RANDALL B. HOFLAND,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD LAHAYE, JR., et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:11-cv-00053-JAW

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On May 24, 2011, the Court issued an Order Affirming the Recommended
Decision of the Magistrate Judge. Order Affirming the Recommended Decision of
the Magistrate Judge (Docket # 23). Shortly after the Court docketed the Order, it
received and docketed a document from the Plaintiff entitled “Supplement to
Plaintiff’s Objection to Recommended Decision.”

Supplement to Pl.’s Ob. to

Recommended Decision (Docket # 24). To clear up any confusion from the receipt of
a document between the Order adopting the Recommended Decision and the entry
of Judgment, the Court has sua sponte reviewed and considered Mr. Hofland’s
supplemental pleading. Having done so, the Court still affirms the Recommended
Decision again for the reasons in the Recommended Decision. The Clerk is directed
to enter Judgment against Randall B. Hofland and in favor of the Defendants in the
above-captioned matter.
SO ORDERED.

/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 26th day of May, 2011