TURCOTTE v. LEPAGE
ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - denying 20 Amended Motion for Reconsideration. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
MICHAEL P. TURCOTTE,
PAUL R. LePAGE, STATE OF MAINE
CIVIL NO. 1:11-cv-312-DBH
ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
The amended motion for reconsideration is DENIED for the reasons stated by
the Magistrate Judge, whose reasoning I endorsed in adopting her Report and
Recommended Decision on January 13, 2012.
Order Affirming Recommended
Decision of the Magistrate Judge (Docket Item 17). The redistricting process for
the Congressional districts is now complete. The full Maine Legislature drew the
The plaintiff does not suggest that the newly drawn districts
violate the “one person, one vote” constitutional mandate. Reynolds v. Sims, 377
U.S. 533, 558 (1964) (quoting Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 381 (1963)). If the
plaintiff is aggrieved by the redistricting process following the next decennial
census in 2020, he can file a suit at that time.
DATED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2012
/S/D. BROCK HORNBY
D. BROCK HORNBY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?